At the small to medium size end of the public sector organisational scale (around 500 employees), software projects typically have budgets in the order of £150,000 over four years – excluding internal resource costs. Such systems may serve around 100,000 customers.
Software project budgets for blue chip companies are often much larger as the workforce and number of customers affected is on a different order of magnitude e.g. 50,000 employees scattered around the globe, with perhaps 5M customers. Budgets for comparable business systems are therefore in the order of £3M over 4 years in this sector.
PM’s often manage up to five projects at any given time, so when we compare the project portfolio of a medium size org public sector PM to that of a blue chip PM, from a purely financial point of view (£750k vs £15M), the public sector PM project portfolio looks somewhat trivial.
But is the blue chip PM job really more challenging, and worthy of the higher pay packet?
Both PM’s are responsible for delivering their projects on time, on budget and to the desired quality. The reputation and financial health of their respective organisations depend upon the success or failure of the project. Both PMs work with a variety of stakeholders – technical and non-technical to deliver the project.
The crucial difference in my opinion is the level of resourcing that each PM can enjoy. The public sector PM’s that I see work with skeleton crews to deliver their projects – for example there is often no project support team to produce and maintain GANTT charts, meeting minutes, and perform all of the other essential admin tasks. The public sector PM has to do all of this on top of the leadership / strategic work that a PM fulfills. I put it to you that public sector PMs have to do more for (and with) less. Love to hear your thoughts.